Efficacy of home respiratory culture kits in people with cystic fibrosis

Background: Respiratory cultures are an important part of clinical care for people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic have not allowed for routine collection. To address this, the University of Michigan Adult Cystic Fibrosis Program mailed home culture kits to patients. We hypothesized that results from home sputum samples would be consistent with prior cultures obtained in sputum collected in clinic but that self-collected throat swabs would provide false-negative results. We also sought to determine percentage return rate. Method(s): Adults with CF were sent culture kits containing a specimen cup and a throat swab. Patients had the choice to submit either sample for processing. Medical personnel provided written instructions with the culture kits and, on occasion, instructed patients on proper collection techniques via phone. Samples were then refrigerated for up to 24 hours before a delivery service returned the specimen to a University of Michigan laboratory for analysis. Data collected from December 2020 to December 2021 (N = 77) included percentage return rate, result, source, and presence of microorganisms. Pairwise culture data of samples collected in clinic versus home-collected samples within 1 yearwere included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics and Cohen kappa correlation coefficients were computed for all culture data and subgroups (Table 1A-E). Result(s): Of 77 culture kits returned, 46 had corresponding clinic samples collected using the same method, and the remaining 21 were collected using different methods (throat swab vs sputum sample). Overall, approximately 200 kits were mailed to patients, with a return rate of 38.5%. A similar percentage of positive culture results was obtained with same method of collection: sputum and throat samples (Table 1C, D, E), although the discordance rate between cultures collected in clinic and at home ranged from approximately 10% to 30%. Correlation between clinic and home culture data was generally good throughout, except for clinic Table 1 ( 115): Analysis of respiratory culture results for (A) all cultures, (B) different collection, and (C, D, E) same collection method. *p < 0.05. Cohen kappa correlation coefficient between groups: poor agreement <0.20;fair agreement = 0.21-0.40;moderate agreement = 0.41-0.60;good agreement = 0.61-0.80;very good agreement = 0.81-1.00. PsA = Pseudomonas aeruginosa;Staph = Staphylococcus aureus.(Table Presented)versus home throat swabs, probably because of a lowevent rate in the small sample size. Conclusion(s): The data suggest that, overall, clinic and home culture kits provide similar positive results, although discordance in specific culture results was common. This may be due to natural fluctuations from culture to culture in people with CF. A limitation of this study is that the cultures being compared in our study were not completed on the same day. Nevertheless, our data also indicate that collection technique may influence results for certain microorganisms. How these differences might influence antibiotic selection and treatment outcomes in the era of telemedicine requires more investigation. The return rate was found to be relatively low, demonstrating the need for interventions to improve patient outreach and compliance.Copyright © 2022, European Cystic Fibrosis Society. All rights reserved

Defibrotide Therapy for Sars CoV2 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: SARS-CoV-2 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with endothelial dysfunction and profound dysregulation of the thrombotic/fibrinolytic pathway, with thrombotic complications common in affected patients (pts). Fibrin deposition may be a key feature of the pathobiology, with markedly elevated levels of PAI-1 reported. Defibrotide (DF), a polyanionic naturally-derived polydeoxyribonucelotide with endothelial stabilizing activity, has fibrinolytic, antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties, with known activity in reducing PAI-1 levels and inhibiting heparanase. We now report a prospective, open label, safety and tolerability trial of defibrotide for the management of patients with advanced SARS-CoV-2 related ARDS. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients (pts) were ≥18 years in age, with clinical and radiographic signs of ARDS, no signs of active bleeding, a serum D-Dimer > 2X ULN, and a positive PCR-based assay for SARS-CoV-2. Concomitant use of systemic anticoagulants or fibrinolytics was initially precluded, with the study amended to allow prophylactic doses of systemic heparin in its latter stages. Defibrotide (6.25 mg/kg/dose IV q. 6 hours) was administered for a planned 7-day course, with day 1 defined as the first day of study therapy. Therapy was able to be discontinued prior to day 7 in pts who met the pulmonary response parameter at that earlier timepoint. Patients with a partial response to therapy (> 20% reduction in FiO2) by day 7 were allowed to receive an additional 7 days of therapy (14 days total). Response was defined as complete cessation of supplemental O2 support, or ≥ 2 point reduction in WHO ordinal score for 48 consecutive hours by day 7. Patients were recruited from a single center between October 2020 and March 2021. Results: Twelve pts (median 63 years, range 35-73 years) were treated, with 10 of 12 pts on mechanical ventilation (median FiO2 55%, PEEP 18 mmHg), and six on vasopressor support at the time of study entry. Baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratios ranged from 82 - 200 mmHg. The median D-Dimer was 3.25 mcg/ml (range 1.33-12.3 mcg/ml), and fibrinogen 637 mg/dl (range 250-1208 mg/dl) at study entry. Dexamethasone and remdesivir had been administered prior to DF in all pts, with no other SARS-CoV-2 targeted treatment given during DF therapy. Eleven pts received ≤7 days of therapy, with one pt receiving 14 days. The first 9 pts received DF without other concomitant anticoagulants, with the last 3 pts concurrently receiving prophylactic heparin plus DF. No hemorrhagic or bleeding complications occurred during DF therapy, including the 3 pts receiving concurrent heparin prophylaxis. Likewise, no thrombotic complications developed during study therapy, including the 9 patients in which DF was their sole anti-coagulant. All 12 patients were evaluable for response. Four pts met the day 7 pulmonary response parameter, with 2 pts having a complete cessation of O2 support within this period. Three pts died from progressive pulmonary disease, at 11, 17 and 34 days from study entry. The 3 pts (who died) had the lowest baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratios (82-115 mmHg) of all study subjects. Nine pts (75%) remain alive, 64 to 174 days from study entry, all 9 discharged from their primary hospitalization. Day 30 all-cause mortality was 17% (95%CI: 0-35%). Serial coagulation and fibrinolytic assays were available in 7 patients. Total PAI-1 levels decreased from a median 167 ng/ml (range 105-264 ng/ml) to a median 104 ng/ml (range 55-166 ng/ml) by day 4 of therapy, with all 7 subjects showing a decline in PAI-1 levels at that time point. Total tPA levels increased from a median 3.02 ng/ml (range 0.72 - 36.1 ng/ml) at baseline to 4.5 ng/ml (range 1.1-8.2 ng/ml) by day 4 in study subjects. Allowing for the small sample size, baseline PAI-1, tPA or D-Dimer levels did not impact response. One of two patients with a baseline D-Dimer > 10 mcg/ml responded, while both patients with a baseline D-Dimer <2.0 mcg/ml failed to meet the response parameter. Conclusion: The use of DF for t e management of SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS proved safe and tolerable in a prospective, open label trial. No hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications were reported during therapy. Outcomes were promising, including an overall survival of 75% in a patient population with a historically high mortality rate. (The study was supported by a research grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals) Disclosures: Yanik: Jazz Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Pipe: Sangamo Therapeutics: Other: Scientific Advisory Board;ASC Therapeutics: Other: Scientific Advisory Board;Apcintex: Consultancy;Bayer: Consultancy;Biomarin: Consultancy;Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy;CSL Behring: Consultancy;Freeline: Consultancy;Grifols: Consultancy;HEMA Biologics: Consultancy;Novo Nordisk: Consultancy;Octapharma: Consultancy;Pfizer: Consultancy;Roche: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy;Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy;uniQure: Consultancy. Sisson: Translatebio: Other: Data Safety Committee member. Richardson: Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy;Secura Bio: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;Regeneron: Consultancy;AbbVie: Consultancy;Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultancy;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lawrence: MDI Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Defibrotide: Off label use for ARDS